Questioner: If I have the inclination to avoid a clash
and to settle the file with equanimity; yet the other person
harasses me, insults me; then what should I do?
Dadashri: Nothing at all. That is your karmic account. You should make up your mind that you want to settle [this file] with equanimity. You should always remain within your laws and you should keep solving your puzzle on your own.
Questioner: These clashes that occur, they must be subject to vyavasthit (result of scientific circumstantial evidence), mustn’t they?
Dadashri: Yes, clashes are actually subject to vyavasthit, but when can that be said? After the clash happens. Your firm resolve is, ‘I do not want to get into any clash.’ If you see a pole in your path, then you know, ‘A pole is coming up, I have to walk around it, I definitely do not want to run into it.’ But despite this, if a collusion occurs, then you should say, “It is a result of scientific circumstantial evidence.” If you carry on believing that it is a result of scientific circumstantial evidence from the very beginning, then it would be considered as misuse of vyavasthit.
Dadashri: Nothing at all. That is your karmic account. You should make up your mind that you want to settle [this file] with equanimity. You should always remain within your laws and you should keep solving your puzzle on your own.
Questioner: These clashes that occur, they must be subject to vyavasthit (result of scientific circumstantial evidence), mustn’t they?
Dadashri: Yes, clashes are actually subject to vyavasthit, but when can that be said? After the clash happens. Your firm resolve is, ‘I do not want to get into any clash.’ If you see a pole in your path, then you know, ‘A pole is coming up, I have to walk around it, I definitely do not want to run into it.’ But despite this, if a collusion occurs, then you should say, “It is a result of scientific circumstantial evidence.” If you carry on believing that it is a result of scientific circumstantial evidence from the very beginning, then it would be considered as misuse of vyavasthit.
Comments